Case 3206845/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Hardie v Wilson James Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206845/2021
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Hardie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the matter at the East London Hearing Centre by public video hearing on 16 March 2022. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Chadwick, employment consultant.
Employment Judge Moor held that the Tribunal had no territorial jurisdiction to hear the claims. The judgment does not set out further reasons or make findings on the merits of the claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the Tribunal had no territorial jurisdiction to hear the claims; it does not address the merits. The individual claim type is identified from the listing category rather than described in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the Tribunal had no territorial jurisdiction to hear the claims; it does not address the merits. The individual claim type is identified from the listing category rather than described in the judgment text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.