Case 3206906/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Ekwesh v No 1 Recruitment.uk.com — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206906/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Ekwesh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment in which Employment Judge Byrne struck out the claim. The tribunal recorded that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal also recorded that on 14 December 2021 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment text does not identify the substantive claim type; it states only that 'the claim' was struck out. The claim was struck out because the respondent company had been dissolved and had not been restored to the Register of Companies, and because the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason after being given an opportunity on 14 December 2021 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.