Case 3206911/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Weir v Citigroup Global Markets Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3206911/2021
- Decision date
- 21 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms A Berry, Ms S Harwood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Weir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and found that Mr I Weir was unfairly dismissed. It also found that he did not cause or contribute to the dismissal by blameworthy conduct, and that there should be no deduction for contributory fault or in respect of Polkey.
The tribunal further held that the complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay was well-founded. The judgment was on liability only, and a separate notice of hearing was to be sent to determine remedy and any case management orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Liability only; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim was in relation to notice pay. Liability only; remedy to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.