Case 3207237/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Spence v HS Linwood & Sons Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207237/2021
- Decision date
- 23 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hook Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Spence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr P Spence, brought claims for redundancy pay, notice pay and pay in lieu of holiday pay against HS Linwood & Sons Limited. The respondent did not attend the final hearing or provide representation, and the tribunal proceeded in its absence under rule 47 after considering the available information and the efforts made to contact it.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he had worked for the respondent for 42 years as a fishmonger, had been placed on furlough from March 2020, and was told that his employment would end. It found that the circumstances amounted to redundancy within ERA 1996 s.139 and that the respondent was liable to pay a statutory redundancy payment under s.135. Using the claimant's age, length of service and weekly pay of £400.38, the tribunal calculated the redundancy payment at £11,611.02 gross.
On notice, the tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to 12 weeks' notice under ERA 1996 s.86 because he had more than 12 years' service. As no notice had been given, the respondent was liable in damages for breach of contract, and the tribunal awarded 12 weeks' pay in lieu of notice, being £4,804.56 gross.
On holiday, the tribunal accepted that the claimant was entitled to the statutory minimum under the Working Time Regulations 1998, including paid annual leave and bank holidays, and to a payment in lieu of accrued but untaken leave on termination under reg. 14. It found that he had not taken leave during the relevant period and calculated holiday pay at the daily rate derived from his weekly pay, resulting in an award of £3,923.92 gross. The total judgment sum was £20,339.50 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The reasons record the effective date of redundancy as 1/10/22, but elsewhere the judgment says the employment ended on 1/10/21; the redundancy award calculated was £11,611.02 gross. | Upheld | — | £11,611 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal treated the lack of notice as a breach of contract and awarded 12 weeks' pay in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £4,805 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday calculation in the reasons uses year labels that do not sit neatly with the termination date, but the tribunal's arithmetic and award of £3,923.92 gross are clear. | Upheld | — | £3,924 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,340
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.139
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.135
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.86
- Working Time Regulations 1998 regs 13, 13A and 14
- rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.