Case 3207239/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Gregory v Ministry of Defence — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207239/2021
- Decision date
- 24 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Gregory
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant clarified that he did not bring an unfair dismissal claim. The remaining claim was direct age discrimination under the Equality Act 2010, arising from the rejection of his March 2020 application to join the Army Reserve when he was 52, on the basis that he had not applied before his 50th birthday.
The tribunal found that, on the face of the legislation, paragraph 4(3) of Schedule 9 to the Equality Act 2010 excluded age discrimination claims relating to service in the armed forces. It considered whether section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 allowed the Equality Act to be read compatibly with Convention rights so as to permit the claim, but concluded that the armed forces age-discrimination exclusion was a fundamental feature of the legislation in this context.
The tribunal distinguished T v Ministry of Defence because that case concerned ex-service personnel and service complaints, whereas this case concerned entry into the Army Reserve, where the stated rationale of combat effectiveness was relevant. It therefore held that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success, struck it out and dismissed it, and did not decide the limitation issue or whether the claimant's Article 8 and Article 14 rights were engaged.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The claim was for direct age discrimination concerning rejection of the claimant's application to join the Army Reserve because he had not applied before his 50th birthday. The tribunal struck out and dismissed the claim as having no reasonable prospect of success because it found the claim was excluded by paragraph 4(3) Schedule 9 of the Equality Act 2010 and the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 37 Employment Tribunal Rules
- paragraph 4(3) Schedule 9 Equality Act 2010
- section 3 Human Rights Act 1998
- Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza
- R (Child Soldiers International) v Secretary of State for Defence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.