Case 3207255/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Milne v Shoppar Ltd (in liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207255/2021
- Decision date
- 31 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Illing Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Milne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Milne worked for Shoppar Ltd as Head of Data from 1 April 2020 on an annual salary of £85,000. The tribunal accepted that early conciliation was started against Shoppar Ltd on 19 October 2021 and, applying Selkent Bus Company Ltd v Moore [1996] ICR 836, allowed the respondent name to be substituted from Peter Ville Ward to Shoppar Ltd. It also held that the claims were in time, applying s.23 ERA 1996 and s.207B ERA 1996 to the unlawful deduction claim.
On the facts, the tribunal rejected the respondent's case that employment ended on 30 June 2021. It found an ongoing employment relationship after that date, relying on the payment history and WhatsApp messages about continuing work and funding discussions. The tribunal found that the claimant continued to work through July, August, September and into October 2021, and that the effective date of termination was 14 October 2021 when he last contacted the respondent after non-payment of wages. It held that there was no contractual, statutory, or written authority for the deductions, and that the claimant had not agreed to non-payment of his salary, only to receive 50% of July salary with the balance to follow.
The claim for unauthorised deductions of wages was upheld in the sum of £24,519.21 gross, made up of July, August and September salary plus salary from 1 to 14 October 2021. Holiday pay was also upheld in the sum of £1,634.60 gross, after the tribunal found that 5 days of accrued but untaken holiday remained outstanding and that the claimant had agreed to take 10 days of holiday in July 2021. The notice pay claim was not upheld because the claimant resigned with immediate effect and the tribunal found no outstanding contractual notice payment. The redundancy pay claim was withdrawn at the start of the hearing and dismissed upon withdrawal, giving a total gross award of £26,153.81.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £24,519 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,635 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; the tribunal found the claimant resigned with immediate effect and that no notice pay was outstanding. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Withdrawn at the start of the hearing and dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,154
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Selkent Bus Company Ltd v Moore [1996] ICR 836
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.207B ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.86 ERA 1996
- regs 13 and 13A WTR
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.