Case 3207282/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Jones v TLC Inns Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207282/2021
- Decision date
- 25 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr C Jones, brought claims for unpaid holiday pay and unpaid salary against TLC Inns Ltd (In Liquidation). The respondent did not attend the remote telephone hearing. Employment Judge Burgher heard the matter at the East London Hearing Centre on 25 May 2022 and determined it on the papers and evidence before the tribunal.
The tribunal upheld the claim for unpaid holiday pay and the claim for unpaid wages. It found that 3.36 days of holiday remained unpaid at a daily rate of £169.23, producing £568.61. It also found unpaid wages for 12 days from 6 May 2021 to 21 May 2021 in the sum of £2,030.76, together with underpayment of wages from 23 May 2021 to 22 August 2021 in the sum of £839.64.
The total ordered to be paid was £3,439.01. The tribunal recorded that the calculation was made on a gross basis, with the respondent entitled to make any deductions for tax and national insurance contributions before payment to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded 3.36 days' unpaid holiday at £169.23 per day. | Upheld | — | £569 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award covered £2,030.76 for 12 days' unpaid wages from 6 May 2021 to 21 May 2021 and £839.64 for underpayment of wages from 23 May 2021 to 22 August 2021. | Upheld | — | £2,870 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,439
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.