Case 3207306/2021 · Employment Tribunal
1. Miss Caitlin Hine 2. Mr Robert Fairbrace v Sharp Leisure Consultancy and Bar Service Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207306/2021
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sugarman Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Miss Caitlin Hine 2. Mr Robert Fairbrace
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 8 June 2022, Employment Judge Sugarman heard the claims brought in person by Miss Caitlin Hine and Mr Robert Fairbrace against Sharp Leisure Consultancy and Bar Service Ltd. The tribunal upheld each claimant's claim for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of pay due for work done to 12 November 2021 and ordered £352.54 net to each claimant.
The tribunal also upheld each claimant's claims in respect of accrued but untaken holiday on termination, recording that the unlawful deductions from wages and Working Time Regulations 1998 claims succeeded and ordering a single net sum of £768.54 to each claimant. It further made an award of £1,730.76 to each claimant under s38(3) of the Employment Act 2002 because the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Each claimant's total award was £2,851.84, making the combined awards £5,703.68.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First Claimant (Miss Caitlin Hine); claim for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of pay due for work done to 12 November 2021 succeeded. | Upheld | — | £353 |
| Holiday pay | First Claimant (Miss Caitlin Hine); unlawful deductions from wages and Working Time Regulations 1998 claims in respect of accrued but untaken holiday on termination succeeded; the tribunal ordered a single net sum and did not split the amount between the two legal bases. | Upheld | — | £769 |
| Other | First Claimant (Miss Caitlin Hine); statutory award under s38(3) of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second Claimant (Mr Robert Fairbrace); claim for unlawful deductions from wages in respect of pay due for work done to 12 November 2021 succeeded. | Upheld | — | £353 |
| Holiday pay | Second Claimant (Mr Robert Fairbrace); unlawful deductions from wages and Working Time Regulations 1998 claims in respect of accrued but untaken holiday on termination succeeded; the tribunal ordered a single net sum and did not split the amount between the two legal bases. | Upheld | — | £769 |
| Other | Second Claimant (Mr Robert Fairbrace); statutory award under s38(3) of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,704
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Working Time Regulations 1998
- s38(3) of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.