Case 3207309/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Collins v Pinetree Marketing Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207309/2021
- Decision date
- 4 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimant
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Collins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone at East London Employment Tribunal on 4 July 2022 before Tribunal Judge D Brannan, sitting as an Employment Judge. Neither the claimant nor the respondent attended the hearing.
The judgment records a single dispositive finding: the claimant's claims were dismissed. The extracted text provided does not set out any separate findings of fact, legal reasoning, or claim-by-claim analysis, and it records no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The extracted text gives no claim-specific reasoning or remedy breakdown. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The extracted text gives no claim-specific reasoning or remedy breakdown. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The extracted text gives no claim-specific reasoning or remedy breakdown. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The extracted text gives no claim-specific reasoning or remedy breakdown. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.