Case 3207311/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Joselin Buxton v J.R. Capital Group Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207311/2021
- Decision date
- 6 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sugarman Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Joselin Buxton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 6 June 2022 before Employment Judge Sugarman, the respondent did not attend. The claimant succeeded on her claim for accrued but untaken holiday on termination under Regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal awarded £463.45 gross, calculated from gross weekly pay of £223.89 and an accrued entitlement of 2.07 weeks' holiday.
The claimant also succeeded on her claim for unlawful deductions from wages relating to pay for August 2021, which was due to be paid in the first week of September 2021. The tribunal ordered payment of £970.19 gross, with tax deductible as stated in the judgment.
The claim for notice pay was described as having been made in error and was dismissed upon withdrawal. No other remedy was recorded, and the total amount ordered payable by the respondent was £1,433.64 gross.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Claim succeeded in respect of accrued but untaken holiday on termination under Regulations 14 and 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Award stated as £463.45 gross, based on gross weekly pay of £223.89 and accrued entitlement of 2.07 weeks' holiday. | Upheld | — | £463 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded in respect of pay for August 2021, due to be paid in the first week of September 2021. Award stated as £970.19 gross, from which the respondent was entitled to deduct tax. | Upheld | — | £970 |
| Breach of contract | Claim for notice pay was said to have been made in error and was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,434
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.