Case 3207411/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Mia Udeen v 13 Rivers Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207411/2021
- Decision date
- 19 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Travers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Mia Udeen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Mia Udeen’s claims were heard remotely by Employment Judge Travers at East London Hearing Centre on 19 July 2022. The judgment records no lay members. The tribunal dealt with two claims: unauthorised deductions from wages and a complaint under the Working Time Regulations 1998 concerning holiday pay.
For the wages claim, the tribunal decided that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present her complaint within three months of the last in the series of deductions, and that she had presented it within a reasonable period thereafter. It declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £5,000 gross in respect of the unauthorised deductions. That figure is recorded as the total of the deductions found to have been made.
For the Working Time Regulations claim, the tribunal similarly found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the complaint within three months of the date when holiday pay should have been made, and that it was brought within a reasonable period thereafter. It ordered payment of £717.66 gross for outstanding holiday pay, calculated on 9.33 days at £79.92 per day.
The total payable under both claims was therefore £5,717.66 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the wages deduction complaint within three months of the last deduction, and that she presented it within a reasonable period thereafter. It declared that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £5,000 gross, being the total of the unauthorised deductions. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the Working Time Regulations complaint within three months of the date on which the holiday pay should have been made, and that she presented it within a reasonable period thereafter. It ordered the respondent to pay £717.66 gross for outstanding holiday pay, calculated on 9.33 days at £79.92 per day. | Upheld | — | £718 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,718
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- within a reasonable period thereafter
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.