Case 3207412/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms R Jain v Bywaters (Leyton) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3207412/2021
- Decision date
- 9 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms R Jain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs R Jain brought complaints of direct sex discrimination and direct race discrimination against Bywaters (Leyton) Limited, both arising from the allegation that the Respondent did not permit her to work flexibly. The judgment records that each complaint was brought under sections 13 and 39 of the Equality Act 2010.
At a preliminary hearing on 14 February 2023, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £250 in respect of each of the two claims. The order was sent to the claimant on 17 February 2023. The claimant did not pay either deposit.
Because the deposits were not paid, Employment Judge Crosfill struck out both the sex discrimination claim and the race discrimination claim under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No substantive findings on liability or remedy were made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim under sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010, alleging less favourable treatment by not permitting flexible working. A deposit order of £250 was made at a preliminary hearing on 14 February 2023 and sent on 17 February 2023; the claimant did not pay the deposit, so the claim was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim under sections 13 and 39 Equality Act 2010, alleging less favourable treatment by not permitting flexible working. A deposit order of £250 was made at a preliminary hearing on 14 February 2023 and sent on 17 February 2023; the claimant did not pay the deposit, so the claim was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.