Case 3207438/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207438/2021
- Decision date
- 27 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a public preliminary hearing at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 27 June 2022, before Employment Judge A M Buchanan sitting alone. The claimant, Ms Olivia Hammond, appeared in person and the respondent, the Department for Work and Pensions, was represented by Ms Georgia Hicks of Counsel.
The tribunal's only recorded substantive decision was that the claim was struck out as vexatious pursuant to Rule 37(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The extracted judgment does not set out the underlying factual allegations or identify the specific claim type in the text provided.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment contains no separate liability findings beyond the strike-out decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. At a public preliminary hearing on 27 June 2022, the tribunal struck out the claim as vexatious pursuant to Rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(a) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.