Case 3207441/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Janice Gadsdon v Ravenscourt Brentwood Limited and 3 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3207441/2021
- Decision date
- 31 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sugarman Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Janice Gadsdon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt East London Hearing Centre on 31 August 2023, Employment Judge Sugarman heard the claimant, Janice Gadsdon, who appeared in person, and the respondent, represented by Mrs B Bird, Solicitor. The judgment records an application by the claimant to strike out the response because of alleged non-compliance with a Tribunal order.
The Tribunal refused that application under Rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The judgment does not record any determination of the underlying substantive employment claims and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment concerns the claimant's application to strike out the response for non-compliance with a Tribunal order under Rule 37(1)(c). The application was refused; the underlying substantive claims were not determined in this judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.