Case 3207487/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A. Junaid v Tower Hamlets Council for Voluntary Service — 2023
- Case reference
- 3207487/2021
- Decision date
- 25 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms T. Jansen, Mrs S. Jeary
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A. Junaid
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs A. Junaid's case against Tower Hamlets Council for Voluntary Service was heard at East London Hearing Centre on 21 to 25 August 2023 before Employment Judge Massarella sitting with Ms T. Jansen and Mrs S. Jeary. The judgment dated 25 August 2023 records that the claimant's case was struck out.
The tribunal found that the claimant had conducted the proceedings unreasonably and that a fair trial was no longer possible. It relied on rule 37(1)(b) and rule 37(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunals Constitution and Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment contains no merits findings on the underlying dispute and records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The supplied judgment text does not identify the individual causes of action; it records that the claimant's case was struck out for unreasonable conduct of the proceedings under rule 37(1)(b) and because a fair trial was no longer possible under rule 37(1)(e). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(b) of the Employment Tribunals Constitution & Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 37(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunals Constitution & Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.