Case 3207490/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Y P Ibarguen Arias v CHOZEN HOLDINGS Ltd C/O Cp Foods — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207490/2021
- Decision date
- 1 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Y P Ibarguen Arias
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 16 June 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations on why the claim should not be struck out, after the claimant had not replied to the tribunal’s letters dated 21 May and 7 June 2022 and the tribunal considered that the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, in response.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records that the hearing listed for 4 July 2022 would not take place. The decision is signed by Employment Judge Taylor Date on 1 July 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the substantive pleaded claim beyond the case being listed under Working Time Regulations in the case context. The tribunal struck the claim out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.