Case 3207502/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Masood v KK Security & FM Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207502/2021
- Decision date
- 21 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Representation
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Masood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short preliminary judgment at East London Employment Tribunal on 21 November 2022. Mr F Masood appeared in person and KK Security & FM Ltd did not attend. The issue listed for determination was whether there was a direct contractual relationship between the parties.
The tribunal found that Mr Masood worked for the respondent and that there was a direct contractual relationship between them. It also found that he was a worker within section 230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
On that basis, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to hear his claim in respect of unpaid wages. The judgment does not record any determination of the substantive unpaid wages claim and does not record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Preliminary jurisdiction issue only. The tribunal found a direct contractual relationship, that the claimant was a worker under section 230(3) ERA 1996, and that it had jurisdiction to hear the unpaid wages claim. No merits decision or award was recorded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 230(3) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.