Case 3207511/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Maurin-Massa v PMP Recruitment Limited (in administration) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207511/2021
- Decision date
- 12 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Maurin-Massa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dealt with a preliminary hearing concerning the Claimant's race discrimination claim against Amazon UK Services. The Claimant alleged that Amazon treated him less favourably because he is Black British by requiring his removal from site and withdrawing an alleged offer of permanent employment after a sexual misconduct complaint was made against him. It was common ground at the hearing that PMP Recruitment Limited, not Amazon, was his employer, so the Claimant did not pursue unfair dismissal or pay claims against Amazon.
The Tribunal found that time began to run on 27 June 2021 for both alleged acts and that the Claimant should have started ACAS early conciliation by 26 September 2021. He did so on 11 October 2021, making the race claim against Amazon 15 days out of time. The Tribunal found that the delay was caused by the Claimant's lack of knowledge of time limits, but that this ignorance was not reasonable because he had access to ACAS, the internet and legal advice while still within time.
The Tribunal also considered the merits and found that the claim did not have reasonable prospects, though it did not find that it had no reasonable prospects. It concluded that it was not just and equitable to extend time, and struck out the race discrimination claim against Amazon for lack of jurisdiction. The Tribunal noted that, had it extended time, it would have made a £100 deposit order because the claim had little reasonable prospects of success.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The race discrimination claim against the Second Respondent, Amazon UK Services, was struck out because it was presented 15 days outside the primary time limit and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. The unfair dismissal, notice pay and holiday pay claims against PMP were not adjudicated in this judgment. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
13 references- rule 30A Employment Tribunals Rules postponement
- s123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension of time
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link
- Southwark London Borough Council v Afolabi
- Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation
- Lupetti v Wrens Old House Ltd
- Rathakrishnan v Pizza Express (Restaurants) Ltd
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- rule 39 Employment Tribunals Rules deposit order
- Hemdan v Ishmail
- Adams v Kingdon Services Group Ltd
- Madarassy v Nomura International plc
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.