Case 3207901/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Kinect Services Limited v 24 × 7 (UK) Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207901/2021
- Decision date
- 17 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fowell Members
- Panel members
- Mr B Wakefield, Ms J Houzer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Kinect Services Limited
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in which the tribunal ordered that the respondent had breached regulation 11 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 by failing to notify the claimant with employee liability information. The parties agreed that the remedy figure for that failure was £20,500.
The judgment also records that the parties agreed there would be no applications for costs. No other claims, findings, or legal tests are stated in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | By consent, the tribunal ordered that the respondent was in breach of regulation 11 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 because it failed to notify the claimant with employee liability information. | Upheld | — | £20,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,500
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £20,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.