Case 3207916/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Glossop v International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3207916/2021
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beyzade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a single claim for automatically unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure under s.103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. After a preliminary hearing on 15 February 2023, the claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £50, and the order was sent on 28 February 2023.
Because the claimant did not pay the deposit, the complaint was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment states that the hearing listed for 31 October and 1-2 November 2023 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claim was for automatically unfair dismissal for making a protected disclosure under s.103A ERA 1996. It was struck out under rule 39(4) because the claimant did not pay the £50 deposit ordered after the preliminary hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- rule 39(4) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.