Case 3212847/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Anthony Robinson v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3212847/2020
- Decision date
- 3 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Knight Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anthony Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the Respondent unfairly dismissed the Claimant. The short judgment does not set out detailed factual findings or reasoning beyond the finding of unfair dismissal.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to reinstate the Claimant by 16:00 on 5 March 2021 and to treat him as if he had received any improvements to his terms and conditions of employment that he would have obtained had he not been dismissed. It also ordered payment of £17,669.75 in compensation for unfair dismissal, described as £23,587.20 less £5,917.45 earned and received in benefits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment also ordered reinstatement by 16:00 on 5 March 2021 and preservation of terms and conditions improvements the Claimant would have received had he not been dismissed. | Upheld | — | £17,670 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,670
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £17,670
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.