Case 3212859/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Mihneva v Belvar Life UK Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3212859/2020
- Decision date
- 29 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Mihneva
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 22 February 2021, the tribunal gave Miss A Mihneva an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why her unfair dismissal complaint should not be struck out. The reason given was that she appeared to have insufficient service to claim unfair dismissal.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the claimant’s remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 4 October 2021. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint because the claimant had insufficient service to bring that claim and did not make representations or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to do so by letter dated 22 February 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.