Case 3212885/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Awotar v Mr S Rose — 2022
- Case reference
- 3212885/2020
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Members
- Panel members
- Ms J McLaughlin, Mr L O'Callaghan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Awotar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously held that the Claimant’s sex discrimination claim succeeded. It awarded compensation for injury to feelings in the sum of £11,000, payable by the Respondent within 28 days.
The complaint of pregnancy and maternity discrimination under section 18 of the Equality Act 2010 did not succeed and was dismissed. The unfair dismissal claim also did not succeed and was dismissed.
Separately, the tribunal found that the Respondent failed to provide a written statement of the Claimant’s employment particulars. For that failure, it awarded two weeks’ pay in the gross sum of £865.38, also payable within 28 days.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Compensation awarded for injury to feelings in the sum of £11,000. | Upheld | Sex | £11,000 |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Complaint under section 18 Equality Act 2010 dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars; award of two weeks' pay calculated gross. | Upheld | — | £865 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,865
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 18 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.