Case 3212974/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Burris and others (as set out in the schedule attached). v Balfour Beatty Group Employment Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3212974/2020
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Burris and others (as set out in the schedule attached).
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal had sent an order to the parties on 19 March 2021 requiring the Claimants to say whether they were pursuing their claims. The order warned that the case could be struck out under Rule 37 of the Tribunal Rules if the claims were not being pursued.
The Tribunal found that the Claimants had failed to make written representations, or sufficient written representations, explaining why strike out should not occur. The claims were therefore struck out on the stated grounds that the Claimants had not complied with the Tribunal's order and the claims had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claims were struck out under Rule 37 because the claimants had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 19 March 2021 and the claims had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action adjudicated in this strike-out decision. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Tribunal Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.