Case 3213045/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Artur Kalwat v H & P Freightways Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3213045/2020
- Decision date
- 26 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hallen Members
- Panel members
- Ms M. Legg, Ms P. Alford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Artur Kalwat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 26 May 2022 before Employment Judge Hallen with members Ms M. Legg and Ms P. Alford. The judgment records the claimant as Mr Artur Kalwat and the respondent as H & P Freightways Limited.
The tribunal's judgment is limited to recording that the respondent will pay the claimant £8,750 on or before 9 June 2022. The payment is stated to be in full and final settlement of the claim and any claims arising from the claimant's employment and the termination of his contract of employment.
No liability findings, legal analysis, or separate remedy breakdown are set out in the extracted text, so the judgment is treated as a settlement outcome rather than a substantive determination of the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records a payment of £8,750 in full and final settlement of the claim and any claims arising from the claimant's employment and the termination of his contract of employment. No substantive liability findings are set out in the extracted text. | Settled | — | £8,750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,750
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.