Case 3213050/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Genova v Catatel Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3213050/2020
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crosfill Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Genova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss P Genova brought a claim for unlawful deduction from wages against Catatel Limited. The tribunal substituted Catatel Limited as respondent after the ET3 was filed on behalf of that legal entity, and proceeded in the respondent's absence after it failed to comply with directions and did not attend the hearing. The claim was heard on 5 July 2021 before Employment Judge Crosfill.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found a deduction of £710.00 from wages due in August 2020. The respondent had not denied that wages were due, but had purported to set off sums said to be owed by the claimant without any written agreement contrary to section 13 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £710 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £710
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 ERA 1996
- section 13 ERA 1996
- rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.