Case 3213297/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Gavriel v Café17 — 2021
- Case reference
- 3213297/2020
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Gavriel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The Tribunal considered whether that complaint should be struck out under rule 37 because it had no reasonable prospect of success.
By letter dated 31 December 2020, the Tribunal gave Miss P Gavriel an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that she failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal. The judgment does not record any compensatory or basic award, or any other monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the Tribunal notified the claimant on 31 December 2020 and found the claim had no reasonable prospect of success; the claimant did not make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.