Case 3213345/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Chiriac v Pavers Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3213345/2020
- Decision date
- 16 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Chiriac
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Burgher heard the matter remotely on 16 September 2021. The claimant did not attend the hearing, did not attend the earlier preliminary hearing on 25 June 2021, and had failed to comply with Employment Tribunal orders dated 8 March 2021, 11 March 2021 and 2 July 2021.
After the hearing was adjourned and the tribunal clerk telephoned the claimant twice, with both calls going straight to voicemail and a message left giving the revised start time, the claimant still did not contact the tribunal or attend. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the ET Rules 2013 on the grounds of non-compliance with ET orders and because she was not actively pursuing her claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Struck out pursuant to rule 37 of the ET Rules 2013 for non-compliance with ET orders and because the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out pursuant to rule 37 of the ET Rules 2013 for non-compliance with ET orders and because the claimant was not actively pursuing the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the ET Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.