Case 3213460/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Lawrence v Swanstaff Recruitment Ltd. — 2021
- Case reference
- 3213460/2020
- Decision date
- 25 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hindmarch Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Lawrence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting remotely by CVP at East London Hearing Centre on 21 and 22 October 2021 before Employment Judge Hindmarch, heard Mr D Lawrence’s complaint against Swanstaff Recruitment Limited. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Evans-Jarvis, solicitor.
The sole complaint recorded in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that complaint well founded and upheld it.
The judgment records a basic award of £9,393.85 and a compensatory award of £5,672.28, making a total award of £15,066.13. No separate findings on other claims, deductions, or additional remedies are set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records one successful unfair dismissal complaint and awards a basic award and compensatory award totalling £15,066.13. | Upheld | — | £15,066 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,066
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £9,394
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,672
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.