Case 3213620/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Marian Florin Franga v White Rose Restaurant Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3213620/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cheunviratsakul Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Marian Florin Franga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by Cloud Video Platform at East London Hearing Centre on 10 August 2021 before Employment Judge Cheunviratsakul. The claimant, Marian Florin Franga, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr Bletchley.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claims for wrongful dismissal, unauthorised deductions from wages, and unpaid holiday pay. The judgment does not set out further reasoning in the extracted text, but records those claims as dismissed.
The respondent's counterclaim was found to be well-founded, and the claimant was ordered to pay the respondent £1,050. The judgment was dated 11 August 2021.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim pleaded as unauthorised deductions from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's counterclaim was found well-founded; the claimant was ordered to pay the respondent £1,050. | Upheld | — | £1,050 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,050
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.