Case 3213632/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S L Jones Jr v Joop Leisure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3213632/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Members
- Panel members
- Ms G Forrest, Mr L O'Callaghan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S L Jones Jr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 9 February 2022 before Employment Judge C Lewis, with Ms G Forrest and Mr L O'Callaghan as members, the respondent did not attend and the claimant appeared in person. The tribunal recorded that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment also noted that the claimant reserved his position in relation to a separate personal injury claim in another jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment notes that the claimant reserved his position regarding a separate personal injury claim arising from an accident at work in another jurisdiction. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award comprised £408.50 for 43 hours worked in August 2020 but unpaid at £9.50 per hour, £51.06 for the 12.5% service charge usually added to wages, and £50.50 deducted on 31 August 2020 for a staff bar and food tab in excess of the amount owed. | Upheld | — | £510 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay for holiday accrued between 4 July 2020 and 15 September 2020 but untaken at termination. | Upheld | — | £311 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £821
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.