Case 3219771/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Daltrey v PDA Enfield Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3219771/2020
- Decision date
- 20 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Daltrey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone at East London Hearing Centre on 20 May 2021 before Employment Judge Gardiner. The respondent did not attend. The Tribunal ordered PDA Enfield Limited to pay Miss R Daltrey £384.62 gross for one week's unpaid notice pay, £1,653.83 gross for 21.5 days of accrued holiday at £76.92 per day, and £604.11 gross for arrears of pay reflecting additional hours worked over the period from the week commencing 29 June 2020 to the week commencing 17 August 2020.
The Tribunal also ordered payment of £362.09 for unpaid pension contributions, calculated as the difference between contributions of £7,304.01 that ought to have been paid and £6,941.92 that were paid. The total award recorded by the judgment is £3,004.65.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Unpaid notice pay for 1 week's notice. | Upheld | — | £385 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay for 21.5 days at £76.92 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,654 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay reflecting additional hours worked between week commencing 29 June 2020 and week commencing 17 August 2020. | Upheld | — | £604 |
| Other | Unpaid pension contributions; awarded as the difference between £7,304.01 that ought to have been paid and £6,941.92 that were paid. The judgment does not state a separate legal label for this head. | Upheld | — | £362 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,005
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.