Case 3219784/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Olapo v First Steps After Parents Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3219784/2020
- Decision date
- 28 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goodrich Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms S Harwood, Ms B Saund
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Olapo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment and order by consent at the East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge Goodrich, with Ms S Harwood and Ms B Saund sitting as members. The Respondent's name was amended from 'First Steps After Parent Ltd' to 'First Steps After Parents Limited'.
The Tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay the Claimant £5,000.00 by no later than 2 December 2022. The order does not break that sum down into separate components and does not record any separate findings on liability for the underlying claims.
The judgment records that the Claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The extracted text does not identify the individual claim labels or set out any substantive reasons for the withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the Claimant's claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. It does not identify the underlying causes of action in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.