Case 3219999/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Chantale Romain v British Airways Cityflyer Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3219999/2020
- Decision date
- 27 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Chantale Romain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short procedural judgment in which Employment Judge Burgher struck out the claim brought by Chantale Romain against British Airways Cityflyer Limited. The tribunal said that, by letter dated 25 May 2021, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because she had not complied with tribunal orders dated 25 February 2021 and 8 April 2021 and the case had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, explaining why strike out should not follow, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It also recorded that the hearing listed for 20, 21 and 22 July 2022 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s); it records only that 'the claim' was struck out for non-compliance and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.