Case 3220172/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N. Nazir v Youshipping.co.uk Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3220172/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N. Nazir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone on 18 August 2021 before Employment Judge Peter Wilkinson. The Claimant, Mr N. Nazir, appeared in person. The Respondent, Youshipping.co.uk Ltd, did not attend and was not represented.
The tribunal allowed the Claimant's claims for unpaid wages, contractually agreed bonus, notice pay, and unpaid holiday pay. It recorded the amounts as £945 for unpaid wages, £750 for the unpaid balance of an agreed £1,000 bonus, £882 for holiday pay, and £315 for one week's notice pay.
The tribunal found a total sum owing from the Respondent to the Claimant of £2,892. No separate award for interest or any other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim allowed for unpaid wages calculated as 3 weeks at 35 hours at £9.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £945 |
| Breach of contract | Claim allowed for the unpaid balance of an agreed £1,000 bonus. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Holiday pay | Claim allowed for 14 days' holiday pay calculated at 7 hours per day at £9.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £882 |
| Breach of contract | Claim allowed for notice pay of 1 week calculated at 35 hours at £9.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £315 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,892
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.