Case 3220214/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Bone v Danbro Employment Umbrella Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 3220214/2020
- Decision date
- 9 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Bone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr R Bone, worked for Danbro Employment Umbrella Limited from 13 February 2012 and was continuously assigned to Ford until that assignment ended on 31 July 2020. The tribunal found that he was not provided with any further assignments after that date. It also recorded that his contract guaranteed a minimum of 336 hours' pay per year at national minimum wage, but that he in practice worked 37.5 hours each week while on assignment and would have exceeded the minimum payment guarantee after nine weeks' work.
Applying ss.147 and 148 ERA 1996, the tribunal found that the claimant was laid off because he was not provided with work for more than four consecutive weeks before serving notice, or for a series of more than six weeks within a 13-week period. He served written notice of eligibility for redundancy on 14 October 2020. The respondent replied by email on 19 October 2020, but the tribunal found that this did not amount to a counter notice under s.149 ERA 1996, and the respondent did not indicate that there was a likelihood of full employment under s.152 ERA 1996.
The tribunal found that the claimant resigned on 22 October 2020, with notice expiring on 29 October 2020, and that he was therefore entitled to a redundancy payment under s.135(1)(b) ERA 1996. It ordered the respondent to pay £6,456.00, calculated as £538 multiplied by 8 and then by 1.5.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held that the claimant was laid off for the purposes of ss.147-148 ERA 1996 after Ford ended his assignment on 31 July 2020 and no further work was provided. His written notice of eligibility for redundancy on 14 October 2020 was not countered by the respondent's 19 October 2020 email, and no indication of likely full employment was given. | Upheld | — | £6,456 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,456
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.147(1) ERA 1996
- s.147(2) ERA 1996
- s.148 ERA 1996
- s.149 ERA 1996
- s.150 ERA 1996
- s.152 ERA 1996
- s.135(1)(b) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.