Case 3220255/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Moss v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3220255/2020
- Decision date
- 28 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Moss
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a single claim for unlawful deduction from wages based on the claimant's contention that he should have been paid at Band 6 as a fully qualified paramedic from March 2020. At the outset of the hearing, the judge limited the case to the alleged wage shortfall and did not consider the claimant's separate claimed amounts for extra hours worked or for inconvenience and effects on health.
The tribunal found that progression along the student paramedic pathway involved qualification stages, including approved training and HCPC registration, before Band 6 status was reached. Although there was a general expectation that student paramedics would qualify within about 2.5 years, the tribunal found that this was not a contractual entitlement. The respondent had already moved the claimant to a higher Band 5 spine point in 2018 despite delays in academic provision, and the claimant did not complete the documentation evidencing full qualification until 8 March 2021.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claimant was paid at the proper rate from March 2020 and that he was not entitled to Band 6 pay before he had fully qualified. The unlawful deduction from wages claim therefore failed and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal considered only the alleged shortfall from not being paid at the Band 6 rate from March 2020. The claimant's additional amounts for extra hours worked and compensation for inconvenience/health effects were not within the pleaded unlawful deduction claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.13(3) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.