Case 3220356/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C O’Hara v Braintree Tumble Tots — 2023
- Case reference
- 3220356/2020
- Decision date
- 26 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Beyzade Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C O’Hara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mrs C O'Hara's claim against Braintree Tumble Tots. In reasons dated 26 July 2023, Employment Judge Beyzade recorded that the tribunal had written to the claimant on 20 July 2022 and given her an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No remedy was awarded and no substantive findings were made on the underlying merits in the extracted reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted reasons do not identify the substantive pleaded heads of claim. The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued after the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's letter dated 20 July 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.