Case 3220513/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A. Massey v Mr and Mrs Patrick Phillips t/a Kentwell Hall — 2021
- Case reference
- 3220513/2020
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms A. Massey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the telephone hearing on 5 July 2021, before Employment Judge Massarella, the Respondent did not attend and was not represented. The judgment records two matters: a statutory redundancy payment claim and a claim for accrued but untaken holiday pay.
The statutory redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment does not set out any further findings on that claim beyond recording its withdrawal and dismissal.
The Tribunal found that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant in respect of 18 days’ accrued, but untaken, holiday. It ordered the Respondent to pay £2,209.72.
The award was ordered gross and without deductions, and the judgment states that the Claimant must account to HMRC for any tax liability that may arise. No separate interest award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the Claimant’s statutory redundancy payment claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The Tribunal found that the Respondent failed to pay the Claimant in respect of 18 days’ accrued, but untaken, holiday and ordered payment of £2,209.72 gross without deductions. | Upheld | — | £2,210 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,210
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.