Case 3220529/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms H Callaghan v Essex Motor Company Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3220529/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gardiner Members
- Panel members
- Ms J Clark, Mr P Lush
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms H Callaghan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at East London Hearing Centre on 4, 5, 6 and 7 October 2022, before Employment Judge Gardiner sitting with Ms J Clark and Mr P Lush, the tribunal dealt with Ms H Callaghan's complaints against Essex Motor Company Limited. The judgment records that the complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's complaints of disability discrimination were not well founded and dismissed them. The judgment does not set out any separate monetary award, and no remedy was recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unauthorised deduction of wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaints of disability discrimination were not well founded and were accordingly dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.