Case 3220554/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Marcus-Dew v Jublee Number 7 Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3220554/2020
- Decision date
- 3 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Marcus-Dew
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Marcus-Dew was employed by Jublee Number 7 Ltd from 11 April 2015 until she resigned on 23 September 2020. The tribunal proceeded in the respondent's absence under Rule 47, accepted the claimant's evidence on the key facts, and substituted the respondent's name to Jublee Number 7 Ltd. It found that the claimant's salary was not paid at all for February, March, June, July and August 2020, and was only partly paid for April and May 2020, contrary to an express contractual term providing for a salary of £50,000 per year paid monthly.
The tribunal held that the repeated failure to pay salary was a cumulative repudiatory breach of contract. It found that the claimant resigned because of that breach and had not affirmed the contract by delay, so the claim succeeded as a constructive dismissal under section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal also found a separate repudiatory breach of the implied term of trust and confidence in relation to the disciplinary process: the claimant was suspended on 10 March 2020, sent an accusatory letter two weeks later, experienced substantial and unexplained delay in the process, and never received a disciplinary outcome before resigning.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,152, calculated on four weeks' gross pay at £538. It assessed compensatory loss at £21,682 after offsetting net earnings against projected loss of £49,250, then applied a 25% ACAS uplift of £5,420 to reach £27,102. It further accepted future loss and loss of statutory rights at £7,390, applied a further 25% uplift of £1,847, and brought the compensatory element to £36,339. The total award was £38,491.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found constructive dismissal on two related bases: repeated non-payment or underpayment of the claimant's contractual salary, and a separate breach of the implied term of trust and confidence in the handling of the disciplinary process. | Upheld | — | £38,491 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £38,491
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,152
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £36,339
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- repudiatory or fundamental breach
- affirmation by delay
- implied term of trust and confidence
- ACAS Code of Practice uplift
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.