Case 3220651/2020 · Employment Tribunal

In person For the v Respondent — 2021

Case reference: 3220651/2020
Decision date: 10 December 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a public preliminary hearing before Employment Judge A M Buchanan on 1 November 2021, with the judgment dated 10 December 2021. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.

The Tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint under the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. It also recorded that the reference in respect of a redundancy payment under section 163 of the 1996 Act was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.

The Tribunal did not strike out any of the remaining complaints and did not make any deposit order in respect of any specific allegation or argument then advanced. Separate orders were issued to clarify the issues in the complaints that remained and to make case management directions.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant at the public preliminary hearing.	Withdrawn	—	—
Redundancy	Reference for a redundancy payment under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.