Case 3220769/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Sharp v East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3220769/2020
- Decision date
- 12 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Scott Members
- Panel members
- Mrs S Jeary, Ms M Daniels
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting at East London Hearing Centre by Cloud Video Platform on 11 and 12 November 2021, found that the Claimant’s section 15 Equality Act 2010 disability discrimination claim failed. The unanimous judgment states that the Respondent did not unlawfully discriminate against the Claimant, and that claim was dismissed.
The Claimant also brought a breach of contract claim for notice pay. That claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No remedy was awarded and the judgment does not record any separate monetary sum for either claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the Respondent did not unlawfully discriminate against the Claimant contrary to section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The Claimant's breach of contract claim for notice pay was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 15 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.