Case 3300000/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Dixon-Davies (Friend). For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3300000/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms L Dixon-Davies (Friend). For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bury St Edmunds on 13 March 2020 before Employment Judge S Moore. The claimant was represented by Ms L Dixon-Davies and the respondent by Mr T Gooder. The judgment records that the claims of sex discrimination, disability discrimination and victimisation, brought contrary to sections 13, 15, 21 and 27 of the Equality Act 2010, were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
No liability findings or remedy assessment were made, and the judgment does not record any award of compensation or other monetary relief.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed after withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim under s.15 and s.21 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed after withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Claim under s.27 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed after withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.