Case 3300002/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3300002/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cambridge on 31 October 2019, before Employment Judge Tynan, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Miss L Hatch, Counsel. The written judgment records the case number 3300002/2019 and identifies the parties as Mr M Greenwood v (1) RFE International (Group) Limited; (2) RFE Europa Limited; (3) RFE UK Limited.
The tribunal dismissed the claims against the First Respondent and the Third Respondent because the claimant withdrew them. The written record does not set out any substantive liability findings, does not identify the specific claim heads determined, and records no remedy or monetary award.
The note to the judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment records that the claims against the First Respondent and the Third Respondent were dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. It does not identify the substantive claim type or any substantive findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.