Case 3300003/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Dewgarde v Mussett Aerospace Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300003/2024
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Dewgarde
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 7 March 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment only states that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.