Case 3300004/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr JC Lewis C1 Ms I Shah C2 v AM Coffee Retail Ltd R1 Hari D Varatharajah R2 — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300004/2024
- Decision date
- 10 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr JC Lewis C1 Ms I Shah C2
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment in which Employment Judge Quill, sitting alone at Watford on 6 August 2024, dismissed the claim under Rule 47. The claimants, Mr JC Lewis and Ms I Shah, did not attend and were not represented. The respondent, AM Coffee Retail Ltd and Mr H D Varatharajah, was represented by Mr C Ushieagu, litigation consultant.
The written record does not set out the substantive allegations or make findings on the merits. It records only that the claim was dismissed and that any application for reconsideration must be made within the usual time limits. The judgment was sent to the parties on 10 October 2024.
Because the case was dismissed without a merits determination, no compensation or other remedy was awarded and no legal test was articulated in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 because neither claimant appeared and neither was represented at the hearing. No substantive reasons on the merits are given in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.