Case 3300018/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Musa v Reckitt Benckiser Health Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300018/2022
- Decision date
- 14 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Margo Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Musa
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn the respondent’s application, Employment Judge Margo struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(a) and/or (b) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. The tribunal held that it was an abuse of process to pursue the claim following the dismissal of claim no. 3300035/2022, or alternatively that the claimant was prevented from pursuing it by the principle of cause of action estoppel.
The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits. It is a procedural disposal only, based on the earlier proceedings and the tribunal’s conclusion that the present claim could not proceed. The respondents’ application for costs was refused.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that 'the claim' was struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) and/or (b); the extracted text does not specify the underlying substantive causes of action. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37(1)(a) and/or (b) ET Rules of Procedure
- abuse of process
- cause of action estoppel
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.