Case 3300020/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Boulby v Cooleraid Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300020/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Boulby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings brought by Mrs S Boulby against Cooleraid Limited were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The text gives the dismissal only and does not set out any findings on the merits of the case.
No liability findings, remedy assessment, or monetary award are recorded in the judgment. The document is a short withdrawal dismissal with no substantive reasoning stated.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; the claim type is taken from the case listing because the judgment text does not set out individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.