Case 3300024/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Pali v Metroline Travel Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3300024/2019
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bartlett Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Pali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr A Pali brought proceedings against Metroline Travel Limited. It does not set out factual findings or reasons on the merits of any claim.
The tribunal dismissed the proceedings following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No remedy was awarded or addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk category included unfair dismissal, but the judgment does not set out separate adjudication of individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings are dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The gov.uk category included disability discrimination, but the judgment does not set out separate adjudication of individual claims. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | The gov.uk category included right to be accompanied. The judgment itself only records dismissal following withdrawal and does not provide further detail. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.